Spring Break
The correct war
DKS Editors
Issue date: 3/31/09 Section: Opinion
Osama bin Laden attacked the United States more than seven years ago with his Sunni Islamic fundamentalist terror group, al-Qaida. Nearly 3,000 people died.
Finally, someone's going back after the ones responsible.
On Friday President Barack Obama will announce the details of his plan to increase aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan, countries that have become home base for al-Qaida since U.S. military attention was focused on the war in Iraq.
When former President George W. Bush initially sent troops to Afghanistan after Sept. 11, 2001, things were clearing up in that country. The al-Qaida-sympathizing Taliban, also a Sunni Islamic terrorist group, controlled much of Afghanistan in the absence of decent government.
Before Bush diverted attention to Iraq for (as it turns out) no reason, the Taliban were leaving, and a lot of them went to Pakistan. But since getting side-tracked, the Taliban have returned to their old haunts, terrorizing Afghanis and giving sanctuary to al-Qaida.
Obama has committed to correcting Bush's erroneous crusade into the wrong enemy's country by pledging to pull troops out of Iraq by the end of the summer of 2010. He wants 17,000 troops in Afghanistan by the end of this summer and, most recently, another 4,000 military trainers to expand the Afghan army.
The federal deficit is nasty, and economic stimulus spending isn't bound to slow. So really the last thing this ailing country needs is another place to hemorrhage cash, especially if it's on a war - the worst outlet for human resource.
But the U.S. is already knee-deep in combating terror, something Afghanis have dealt with longer than anyone should have to. An American presence in the Middle East isn't going away, perhaps ever. At least now we have a president less motivated by self-interest and bright enough to know where we can do some good.
And we will be doing good. It's like Obama said in his 2002 speech against the war in Iraq:
"I don't oppose all wars. After Sept. 11, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported (the Bush) administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again."
Short of taking up arms himself, Obama is going back and doing what we should have been doing all along. War is a disgusting thing, but sometimes it's the lesser evil. We just hope this doesn't go on any longer than it has to.
The above editorial is the consensus opinion of the Daily Kent Stater editorial board.
Finally, someone's going back after the ones responsible.
On Friday President Barack Obama will announce the details of his plan to increase aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan, countries that have become home base for al-Qaida since U.S. military attention was focused on the war in Iraq.
When former President George W. Bush initially sent troops to Afghanistan after Sept. 11, 2001, things were clearing up in that country. The al-Qaida-sympathizing Taliban, also a Sunni Islamic terrorist group, controlled much of Afghanistan in the absence of decent government.
Before Bush diverted attention to Iraq for (as it turns out) no reason, the Taliban were leaving, and a lot of them went to Pakistan. But since getting side-tracked, the Taliban have returned to their old haunts, terrorizing Afghanis and giving sanctuary to al-Qaida.
Obama has committed to correcting Bush's erroneous crusade into the wrong enemy's country by pledging to pull troops out of Iraq by the end of the summer of 2010. He wants 17,000 troops in Afghanistan by the end of this summer and, most recently, another 4,000 military trainers to expand the Afghan army.
The federal deficit is nasty, and economic stimulus spending isn't bound to slow. So really the last thing this ailing country needs is another place to hemorrhage cash, especially if it's on a war - the worst outlet for human resource.
But the U.S. is already knee-deep in combating terror, something Afghanis have dealt with longer than anyone should have to. An American presence in the Middle East isn't going away, perhaps ever. At least now we have a president less motivated by self-interest and bright enough to know where we can do some good.
And we will be doing good. It's like Obama said in his 2002 speech against the war in Iraq:
"I don't oppose all wars. After Sept. 11, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported (the Bush) administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again."
Short of taking up arms himself, Obama is going back and doing what we should have been doing all along. War is a disgusting thing, but sometimes it's the lesser evil. We just hope this doesn't go on any longer than it has to.
The above editorial is the consensus opinion of the Daily Kent Stater editorial board.
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 75
Dr. Assad Pino
posted 3/31/09 @ 11:57 AM EST
The Americans are the terrorists in Afghanistan,and the Taliban are freedom-fighters waging a just war. The difference between the two is that the Americans are cowards who bomb Afghan villages from 35,000 feet high in the air, perfectly excusable, from the DAILY KENT STATER point of view, since only dark-skinned people are being killed. (Continued…)
Dr. Assad Pino
posted 3/31/09 @ 3:43 PM EST
Excuse, please but I don't take the Zionist News Network (ZNN)as a legitimate news source.
Hand over Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and cast of thousands of other war pimps over to a shariah court for prosecution and then we can discuss justice. (Continued…)
A Mujahid Warns Obama
posted 3/31/09 @ 4:40 PM EST
The commander of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility Tuesday for a deadly assault on a Pakistani police academy and said the group was planning a terrorist attack on the White House that would "amaze" the world. (Continued…)
Mary Jo
posted 3/31/09 @ 7:09 PM EST
AS POSTED BY: Dr. Assad Pino
posted 3/31/09 @ 6:20 PM EST
No, you wouldn't want to submit to shariah court because it would order you stoned to death for polytheism, i. (Continued…)
Drew
posted 3/31/09 @ 8:01 PM EST
God... Allah... religion... disgusting.
You people need to grow up. Clinging to these primitive rituals and beliefs will do nothing but stint the development of our civilization. (Continued…)
Mary Jo
posted 4/01/09 @ 9:24 PM EST
Drew: is that the truth or are you "pulling my leg" because of the comment I made in another article about Catholicism pushed people further away from God?
Greg
posted 4/01/09 @ 10:42 PM EST
It's not a matter of should of finishing the job, but international law. It is illegal to be an occupying force and everyday we occupy Afghanistan we are only angering the citizens of Afghanistan. (Continued…)
Drew
posted 4/02/09 @ 12:37 AM EST
I wasn't advocating non-action Dr. Pino, simply non-violence. There is a difference and killing IS the cowardly option.
Drew
posted 4/02/09 @ 4:12 AM EST
It's true. I honestly did not read your other comment about Catholicism. But I don't think it was Catholicism that pushed me away. It was all religions in general, along with some rational thought and discussion. (Continued…)
Drew
posted 4/02/09 @ 2:20 PM EST
Dr. King and Mahatma Gandhi were both advocates of non-violent protest. You could learn a few things from them.
Thomas Jefferson certainly did no believe in the Bible. (Continued…)
Post a Comment