Spring Break
Freedom comes with responsibility
Marchae Grair
Issue date: 4/10/08 Section: Opinion
Kent State students received a lesson about free speech this week during the demonstrations by The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.
The anti-abortion group spent two days in Risman Plaza protesting against the legalization of abortion.
The group's extreme methods left the campus in shock.
Posters the size of small billboards lined the walkway with grotesque images of abortions. The protest also used enlarged photographs of concentration camp victims to compare the legalization of abortion to the Holocaust.
There are no words to describe the tension the group brought to Kent State.
Pro-choice students rallied to protest against the anti-abortion stance and graphic images of the protest.
Before The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform arrived on campus, Undergraduate Student Senate executive director Katie Hale wrote a letter to students in the Daily Kent Stater.
She asked students to respect the free speech rights guaranteed to The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.
After all, isn't that the purpose of free speech? When a group has an extreme or unpopular opinion, shouldn't they have the right to express it?
As a journalist, I know how important free speech is. I have plenty of unpopular opinions, and I do not want somebody telling me when or where I can express them.
I never take my freedom of speech for granted and believe it is necessary for the existence of a healthy democracy.
However, I cannot condone the irresponsible use of that freedom.
The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform demands respect for their beliefs but gives no respect to the public who is subjected to their protests.
It was both inappropriate to use swastikas and Holocaust victims to debate abortion. The Holocaust was a mass genocide based on the hatred of specific groups of people. It is a painful time in history that should not be used for irrelevant fear-mongering.
Freedom is not an excuse to lose consciousness about what is hurtful.
There are various groups, such as the Westboro Baptist Church, who protest at the funerals of soldiers because they do not believe in the armed forces.
While they have the right to assemble and say whatever they choose, I question the sanity of anyone who would intrude on a family's grief in such a manner.
When people aim for shock value, the value of freedom of speech is loss. The power of informed debates and researched opinions take a backseat to heated exchanges and battles for press coverage.
I do not think the effort of The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform is commendable in the least.
There is a difference between aiming to offend and aiming to inform.
Marchae Grair is an electronic media productions major and columnist for the Daily Kent Stater. Contact her at mgrair1@kent.edu.
The anti-abortion group spent two days in Risman Plaza protesting against the legalization of abortion.
The group's extreme methods left the campus in shock.
Posters the size of small billboards lined the walkway with grotesque images of abortions. The protest also used enlarged photographs of concentration camp victims to compare the legalization of abortion to the Holocaust.
There are no words to describe the tension the group brought to Kent State.
Pro-choice students rallied to protest against the anti-abortion stance and graphic images of the protest.
Before The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform arrived on campus, Undergraduate Student Senate executive director Katie Hale wrote a letter to students in the Daily Kent Stater.
She asked students to respect the free speech rights guaranteed to The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.
After all, isn't that the purpose of free speech? When a group has an extreme or unpopular opinion, shouldn't they have the right to express it?
As a journalist, I know how important free speech is. I have plenty of unpopular opinions, and I do not want somebody telling me when or where I can express them.
I never take my freedom of speech for granted and believe it is necessary for the existence of a healthy democracy.
However, I cannot condone the irresponsible use of that freedom.
The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform demands respect for their beliefs but gives no respect to the public who is subjected to their protests.
It was both inappropriate to use swastikas and Holocaust victims to debate abortion. The Holocaust was a mass genocide based on the hatred of specific groups of people. It is a painful time in history that should not be used for irrelevant fear-mongering.
Freedom is not an excuse to lose consciousness about what is hurtful.
There are various groups, such as the Westboro Baptist Church, who protest at the funerals of soldiers because they do not believe in the armed forces.
While they have the right to assemble and say whatever they choose, I question the sanity of anyone who would intrude on a family's grief in such a manner.
When people aim for shock value, the value of freedom of speech is loss. The power of informed debates and researched opinions take a backseat to heated exchanges and battles for press coverage.
I do not think the effort of The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform is commendable in the least.
There is a difference between aiming to offend and aiming to inform.
Marchae Grair is an electronic media productions major and columnist for the Daily Kent Stater. Contact her at mgrair1@kent.edu.
Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 9
Agreed
posted 4/10/08 @ 11:09 AM EST
Absolutely- I'm glad you wrote this.
Robin Anderson
posted 4/10/08 @ 1:06 PM EST
Easily "overwhelmed", arent' we?
Sorry, Marchae, but this is the reality of life from which hard, sometimes harsh, personal decisions must be made, eh?
Our country tried to turn a blind eye to the "goings-on" that became the Holocast before we ever entered into World War II. (Continued…)
Matt Steward
posted 4/10/08 @ 4:37 PM EST
It's sad that people have to resort to shock tactics in order to get people's attention, because, even though it gets people's attention, it does nothing more than incite critics. (Continued…)
Rachael
posted 4/10/08 @ 5:15 PM EST
I find it interesting when people are ready to defend free speech, but only to the point that it doesn't offend their own sensibilities. I remember groups showing pictures of dead soldiers, and everyone lauded that as wonderful to help stop the war. (Continued…)
MikeK
posted 4/11/08 @ 8:59 AM EST
"When people aim for shock value, the value of freedom of speech is loss"
I would disagree. Shock art amplifies freedom of speech. The 1st amendment not only protects spoken word, but written and symbolic speech as well. (Continued…)
notanignoramus
posted 4/12/08 @ 3:56 PM EST
Most college students are adults and want to be treated that way - so why cry foul when "put upon" by harsh realities? Abortion is genocide against the unborn. (Continued…)
Enter the Leftist Hall of Shame
posted 4/14/08 @ 10:47 AM EST
Don't you love it when Leftists object to conservative speech on grounds of bad taste?
Where was this indignation when Leftists subjected America's streets to their post-9/11 krystalnaght-style gutter riots (ad nauseum), masquerading as "peace" protests?
Physician, heal thyself. (Continued…)
Andrew
posted 4/14/08 @ 7:02 PM EST
Yeah man, it's a vast left-wing conspiracy! Run for your lives! The fact that some people in an extremely right-skewed country, where a center-right party such as the Democrats are seen as far left, have left-wing views is just plain horrible isn't!
God damn! They have empathy for other human beings - what is wrong with these people? They understand that a woman feels suffering and pain and can have her entire life destroyed because some right-wing idiots want her to function as an incubator and that a fetus cannot experience pain until the 7th month! They understand that if those women do decide to have children, unlike the right-wing, they actually support giving that person money for food and not letting her child starve to death! DEAR GOD MAN!
*Learn how to Kristallnacht right. (Continued…)
Post a Comment